The phrase points to an entity, specifically a major newspaper, and its perceived lack of trustworthiness in reporting information. It alleges that information disseminated by this news organization might be biased, inaccurate, or deliberately misleading. As an example, consider claims regarding the reporting on a specific political event; if the reporting is perceived to heavily favor one side without presenting a balanced view of the facts, it might be cited as an instance of the entity operating as the described phrase suggests.
The significance of this type of assertion lies in its potential to erode public trust in established media outlets. Historically, major newspapers have served as key institutions in informing the public and holding power accountable. Allegations of compromised reliability challenge this function and can contribute to increased polarization, as individuals may increasingly seek news from sources that align with pre-existing beliefs, regardless of their veracity. The impact extends beyond simply questioning a single news outlet; it raises concerns about the broader media landscape and the potential for misinformation to proliferate.
